<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
><channel><title>Security News &#187; bug</title> <atom:link href="http://www.secnews.pl/tag/bug/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.secnews.pl</link> <description>Reverse engineering, ochrona oprogramowania.</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:41:10 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>YouTube hidden track</title><link>http://www.secnews.pl/2007/11/14/youtube-hidden-track/</link> <comments>http://www.secnews.pl/2007/11/14/youtube-hidden-track/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 17:12:21 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>bartek</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Inne]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Rozrywka]]></category> <category><![CDATA[bug]]></category> <category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secnews.pl/2007/11/14/youtube-hidden-track/</guid> <description><![CDATA[Czyżby w klipach YouTube były ukryte ścieżki&#8230; &#8230;albo bug playera]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Czyżby w klipach YouTube były ukryte ścieżki&#8230;</p><p><a TITLE="YouTube Hidden Track" HREF="http://www.secnews.pl/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/youtube_hidden_track.png"><img ALT="YouTube Hidden Track" SRC="http://www.secnews.pl/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/youtube_hidden_track.thumbnail.png" /></a></p><p>&#8230;albo bug playera <img src='http://www.secnews.pl/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.secnews.pl/2007/11/14/youtube-hidden-track/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Bug w Excelu 2007 pod IDA</title><link>http://www.secnews.pl/2007/11/08/bug-w-excelu-2007-pod-ida/</link> <comments>http://www.secnews.pl/2007/11/08/bug-w-excelu-2007-pod-ida/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 22:16:59 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>bartek</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Artykuły]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Reversing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[bug]]></category> <category><![CDATA[excel]]></category> <category><![CDATA[ida]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secnews.pl/2007/11/08/bug-w-excelu-2007-pod-ida/</guid> <description><![CDATA[Dokładna analiza wcześniej wspomnianego buga w Excelu This article (500kb PDF) details the Excel 2007 formatting bug. On initial release, entering =850*77.1 in a cell results in 10000, instead of the correct 65535. This article shows this bug is the result of porting 16-bit code to 32-bit code, and shows why exactly 12 values of [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dokładna analiza <a HREF="http://www.secnews.pl/2007/09/27/blad-mnozenia-w-excelu/">wcześniej wspomnianego</a> buga w Excelu</p><blockquote><p>This article (500kb PDF) details the Excel 2007 formatting bug. On initial release, entering =850*77.1 in a cell results in 10000, instead of the correct 65535. This article shows this bug is the result of porting 16-bit code to 32-bit code, and shows why exactly 12 values of the possible 9*10^18 64-bit floating-point values are affected.</p></blockquote><p><a HREF="http://www.lomont.org/Math/Papers/2007/Excel2007/Excel2007Bug.pdf">http://www.lomont.org/Math/Papers/2007/Excel2007/Excel2007Bug.pdf</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.secnews.pl/2007/11/08/bug-w-excelu-2007-pod-ida/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Błąd kompilatora</title><link>http://www.secnews.pl/2007/10/11/blad-kompilatora/</link> <comments>http://www.secnews.pl/2007/10/11/blad-kompilatora/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 05:17:35 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>bartek</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[C#]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Programowanie]]></category> <category><![CDATA[bug]]></category> <category><![CDATA[kompilator]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secnews.pl/2007/10/11/blad-kompilatora/</guid> <description><![CDATA[Ciekawy błąd kompilatora, który poprawnie kompiluje kod w C#, który w praktyce nie jest poprawny http://software.ericsink.com/entries/Not_All_Code_Paths_Return_A_Value.html]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ciekawy błąd kompilatora, który poprawnie kompiluje kod w C#, który w praktyce nie jest poprawny</p><p><a HREF="http://software.ericsink.com/entries/Not_All_Code_Paths_Return_A_Value.html">http://software.ericsink.com/entries/Not_All_Code_Paths_Return_A_Value.html</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.secnews.pl/2007/10/11/blad-kompilatora/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
